If your work touches procurement, AI, or how the two are about to collide, this membership earns its place on your professional development line. This page gives you what you need to make that case to whoever approves it.

The short version

You’re paying for ongoing access to a practitioner publication on procurement and AI, written by someone with ten years in the field and more than fifty AI agents in production. The content is deep-dive analysis, not vendor marketing. Same category of spend as analyst reports, industry publications, or training courses, at a fraction of the cost.

Most organisations approve this as a Learning & Development, Subscriptions, or Research expense. It usually takes one email.

The numbers

  • Monthly: £15/month

  • Annual: £150/year

For context: a single Gartner report often costs more than the entire annual subscription. A single ProcureCon ticket costs ten times more. The annual membership is roughly £2 a week.

What you’re paying for

A working library of practitioner thinking on AI in procurement.

  • Long-form analysis of where the function is going

  • Frameworks you can use in your own AI deployments

  • Deep dives on agentic procurement, contract management, vendor evaluation

  • Direct insight from someone running production agents

  • A research asset you can cite in internal planning

You’re not buying daily news, vendor briefings, or analyst reports you’ve already paid for. You’re buying time you don’t have to spend piecing things together yourself.

Who normally approves it

  • Your direct manager, if you have a discretionary L&D or subscriptions line

  • Head of Procurement or CPO, if you’re asking for a team licence

  • L&D or People Ops, if learning is centrally budgeted

  • IT or Procurement Ops, if they handle digital subscriptions

If you’re not sure who, your manager is the right starting point.

Email template: your own subscription

Subject: World of Procurement subscription request

Hi [name],

I'd like to expense an annual subscription to World of Procurement, a publication on procurement and AI from Daniel Barnes. He's a procurement practitioner with ten years in the field and more than fifty AI agents deployed in production.

The content is directly relevant to our function. It covers AI in procurement, contract management, vendor evaluation, and the operational change underway across the industry. Practitioner-grounded, not vendor marketing.

The cost is £100 a year, which works out to about £8 a month. That's a fraction of what we spend on a single analyst report or a training day. I'd treat it as a continuing development resource and share relevant pieces with the team.

Can you approve, or let me know how to route the request?

Thanks,[Name]

Email template: team or function subscription

Subject: Team subscription proposal for World of Procurement

Hi [name],

I'd like to propose a team subscription to World of Procurement for the [N] members of our function.

The publication is written by Daniel Barnes, a procurement practitioner with ten years in the trade and more than fifty AI agents in production. It covers AI in procurement, contract management, vendor evaluation, and the operational change reshaping the function.

Why I think it's worth it for the team:

- Practitioner-grounded analysis, not vendor marketing- Frameworks the team can use in our own AI deployments- Saves us the time of piecing analysis together ourselves- A single ongoing voice, rather than scattered articles

Cost: £70 per person per year on a team subscription (minimum five seats). For a team of [N], that's £[N × 70] a year.

For comparison, that's less than a single Gartner report and a fraction of a single training day. Happy to share a few free pieces first if useful for evaluating the fit.

Can I proceed?

Thanks,[Name]

If they push back

Most pushback comes in one of two shapes:

“Why this over an analyst report?” Analyst reports tell you what the market has already done. This publication tells you what practitioners are doing now and what’s coming next. Different tool, different value. Both have a place in a procurement function’s reading list. This one is significantly cheaper and refreshed weekly.

“Can we use the free version?” The free pieces are the framework. The paid pieces are the depth. The question is whether the depth matters for the decisions you’re making over the next twelve months. If you’re standing up AI agents, redesigning workflows, or evaluating vendors, it usually does.

If budget genuinely isn’t there, the free pieces remain free. The paid membership is for readers who want more than the framework.

Where to subscribe

Reply

Avatar

or to participate